# MS-PL not compatible with GPL license **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [April 13, 2025, 1:25pm UTC](https://forum.kee.pm/t/ms-pl-not-compatible-with-gpl-license/4938 "2025-04-13T13:25:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![tenzap](https://forum.kee.pm/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/f4b2a3/32.png) [@tenzap](https://forum.kee.pm/u/tenzap)\ **Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 1:25pm UTC](https://forum.kee.pm/t/ms-pl-not-compatible-with-gpl-license/4938/1 "2025-04-13T13:25:12Z")
@luckyrat, could you please have a look at that issue ? > > > The package for keepassRPC was rejected from Debian because the file \`Jayrock/sr…c/Jayrock.Json/Dynamic/DynamicMetaObject.cs\` is licensed under the \[MS-PL\](https://spdx.org/licenses/preview/MS-PL.html). Paragraph 3D of this license is not compatible with GPL. > > \> (D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a license that complies with this license. > > Do you think you could update/patch your sources to work without this file & license? Is it actually really required for KeepassRPC? > > \[Freeze\](https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze\_policy.html) for new packages in the next stable release of Debian starts on 15/Apr. If you have a very quick fix, we could consider trying a new submission. Otherwise, we might would have to wait the next stable release, probably in approx. 2 years. ---
**Author:** ![luckyrat](https://forum.kee.pm/user_avatar/forum.kee.pm/luckyrat/32/10_2.png) [@luckyrat](https://forum.kee.pm/u/luckyrat)\ **Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 1:35pm UTC](https://forum.kee.pm/t/ms-pl-not-compatible-with-gpl-license/4938/2 "2025-04-13T13:35:23Z")
Already done 🙂 Looks like a Debian mistake but let’s continue discussion in the GitHub issue if needed.